RepublicanBill · H.R. 2310· House(119-HR-2310)

COBALT Supply Chain Act

Rep. Smith
Age: 73 years
New Jersey
Introduced
3/24/2025
Last activity
3/24/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
Christopher Smith
Cosponsors
Republican - 1Democrat - 0
Foreign Trade and International Finance
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the "COBALT Supply Chain Act," aims to prevent goods containing cobalt refined in the People's Republic of China (PRC) from entering the United States under the presumption that they were produced using child or forced labor in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). It establishes a rebuttable presumption that such "covered goods" are made with forced or child labor, effectively prohibiting their entry unless importers prove otherwise. The legislation directs the creation of an enforcement strategy by the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force to trace supply chains and prevent these goods from entering through third countries. Additionally, the President must certify annually that federal vehicle purchases are free of parts made or mined with child or forced labor in the DRC or the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. This measure is designed to address national security concerns regarding the PRC's dominance in the cobalt sector.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Would children be better off under this?+7

    The bill specifically targets the prevention of child labor in the cobalt mining industry.

  • Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?+5

    The bill seeks to reduce poverty by combating child and forced labor practices in global supply chains.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5

    The bill requires presidential certification and public reports regarding federal procurement.

The opposite

  • Would business owners be better off under this?-4

    Importers face new regulatory burdens and the need for clear and convincing evidence of supply chain compliance.

  • Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-3

    The rebuttable presumption shifts the burden of proof to importers, which may impact due process standards.

  • Does this make trade with other countries easier?-2

    The bill introduces new trade restrictions and burdens of proof that could complicate international trade flows.