Bill · H.R. 2239· House(119-HR-2239)
Strengthen Wood Product Supply Chains Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 3/18/2025
- Last activity
- 3/18/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Sponsored by
- Rudy Yakym
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The ``Strengthen Wood Product Supply Chains Act of 2025'' aims to amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to ensure more fair enforcement. This bill introduces new requirements for how the Secretary handles merchandise detained for inspection. It mandates specific timelines for issuing notices of detention or releasing goods. The Act also establishes protocols for transporting detained goods to other locations and requires the sharing of test results. Finally, it provides a process for administrative review and court proceedings regarding seizures.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+6
The bill strengthens due process by establishing timelines for release/seizure and providing paths for administrative and judicial review.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill mandates specific timelines and requires the Secretary to provide detailed reasons for detaining merchandise.
Would business owners be better off under this?+4
Importers benefit from increased predictability, transparency, and clearly defined legal recourse for detained goods.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency for Importers: Under Section 2, paragraph (1)(A) and (2), the Secretary must issue a notice of detention within 5 days that includes a specific reason, the anticipated length of detention, and a description of required tests or inquiries. This provides importers with clear information regarding their detained goods.
-
Predictability in Logistics: Section 2, paragraph (A)(3) allows importers to request the transportation of detained merchandise to a location not under U.S. control within 10 days of a detention notice, provided they pay fees and provide a bond.
-
Access to Information: Section 2, paragraph (4) requires the Secretary to provide importers with the results of any tests conducted on detained merchandise, along with enough information for the importer to replicate those tests.
-
Defined Timelines for Resolution: Section 2, paragraph (5)(A) requires the Secretary to either release or seize detained merchandise within 30 days. If the Secretary fails to act within this window, it is automatically deemed a seizure.
-
Rights to Review and Legal Recourse: Section 2, paragraph (6) allows importers to request an administrative review of a seizure. If the Secretary affirms the seizure, the importer has the right to file a claim for relief in a U.S. district court under paragraph (6)(C).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Burdens on Importers: Under Section 2, paragraph (3)(A)(ii), importers must pay all demurrage and storage fees associated with detained merchandise if they wish to transport it to a different location.
-
Financial Requirements for Movement: To move detained goods to a location not under U.S. control, an importer is required to provide a bond for removal from the custody of the United States as stated in Section 2, paragraph (3)(A)(iii).
-
Risk of Seizure: Section 2, paragraph (5)(A)(ii) notes that the Secretary may seize detained merchandise, which could result in the loss of the merchandise for the importer.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+6Improves Government Transparency+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Trade+4
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+2
- 3/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Jim CostaDemocrat · California