Bill · H.R. 2152· House(119-HR-2152)
AI PLAN Act
- Introduced
- 3/14/2025
- Last activity
- 6/24/2026 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 615.
- Sponsored by
- Zachary Nunn
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 5
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
The AI PLAN Act seeks to establish a defense strategy against economic and national security risks caused by artificial intelligence. It focuses on preventing adversarial actors from using AI to commit financial crimes, such as fraud and misinformation. The bill requires the Secretaries of the Treasury, Homeland Security, and Commerce to submit annual reports to Congress. These reports must detail interagency policies and public-private partnerships used to protect financial markets and businesses. Additionally, the reports must analyze available and needed resources to combat AI-driven crimes. Finally, the administration must provide legislative recommendations and best practices for risk mitigation.
Yes· 3 of 11
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+6
The bill establishes a strategy to defend against cyber breaches and AI-supported social engineering.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+5
The bill targets the protection of persons against deepfakes, voice cloning, and digital scams.
Would business owners be better off under this?+4
The bill provides best practices and mitigation strategies for businesses facing AI threats.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Defense of Financial Markets and Businesses: The bill aims to protect United States financial markets, businesses, persons, and global supply chains from risks posed by AI-driven financial crimes (Section 2(b)(1)(A)).
-
Mitigation of Specific AI Threats: The strategy takes into consideration various risks that could harm people, including deepfakes, voice cloning, synthetic identities, and digital fraud or scams (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Protection of Election Integrity: The report requirements include considering risks related to foreign election interference (Section 2(b)(2)(C)).
-
Support for Risk Mitigation: The bill requires the submission of best practices to assist American businesses and government entities with risk mitigation and incident response (Section 2(c)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5Improves Economic Growth+3Improves Small Business Support+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+4Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Urban Residents+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense+6
- Education And Technology
- Improves Data Privacy+4
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Voting Rights+2
- 6/24/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-708.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 615.
- 5/13/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 52 - 0.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/14/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Nicholas BegichRepublican · Alaska
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York
James HimesDemocrat · Connecticut
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia