Bill · H.R. 2103· House(119-HR-2103)
Protect Postal Performance Act
- Introduced
- 3/14/2025
- Last activity
- 3/14/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Nikki Budzinski
- Cosponsors
- - 24 - 7
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Protect Postal Performance Act" aims to modify how the United States Postal Service handles the closure or consolidation of post offices and processing centers. It introduces mandatory public hearings and transparency requirements regarding post office closures. The bill establishes specific geographic and population-based restrictions to prevent certain post offices from being closed. Additionally, it places limits on changes to mail processing facilities and requires advisory opinions from the Postal Regulatory Commission. It also restricts closures in districts that have failed to meet specific on-time delivery benchmarks. Finally, it restricts certain transportation optimization efforts that would reduce mail pick-up or drop-off frequency.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8
The bill requires public hearings and the publication of community feedback summaries on the USPS website.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+7
The bill protects post offices in isolated areas and prevents the loss of service in non-contiguous regions.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
Maintaining local post office access can help low-income households manage essential tasks and mail.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Public Transparency: The bill requires the Postal Service to hold public hearings (in-person or virtually) regarding post office closures or consolidations, and mandates that a summary including public comments be published on their website (Section 2).
-
Protection of Isolated Post Offices: A post office cannot be closed or consolidated if it is not within 15 miles of another post office (Section 2).
-
Protection of High-Population Service Points: The bill prevents the closure of a post office if it is the closest one for a population of s 15,000 individuals (Section 2).
-
Guarding Against Regional Service Gaps: The Postal Service is prohibited from closing or consolidating centers if the action would leave a non-contiguous region of a State (separated by water or land) without a center, provided that region has more than 100,000 residents (Section 3(a)).
-
Ensuring Mail Delivery Standards: The bill prevents the closure or movement of operations in districts that failed to meet specific on-time delivery rates for first-class mail in the previous year (Section 3(d)).
-
Preventing Service Reductions via Optimization: The bill prohibits transportation optimization efforts that would decrease the number of times mail is picked up or dropped off at any post office (Section 4(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Delays in Operational Changes: The bill requires a 180-day waiting period after a hearing summary is published before a post office can be closed or consolidated (Section 2).
-
Operational Delays due to Commission Reviews: Changes to mail processing facilities cannot occur until the Postal Regulatory Commission issues an advisory opinion, which can take up to 120 business days (Section 3(b)).
-
Mandatory Service Delays During Review: If a proposed change is found to lead to slower on-time mail delivery, the Postal Service must publish a report and cannot implement changes for 180 days (Section 3(b)).
-
Funding Restrictions on Reviews: Federal funds cannot be used to carry out the United States Postal Service Mail Processing Facility Review (Section 3(c)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+7Good For Low Income Households+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+8
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Public Transit+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+1
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/6/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/24/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/14/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Jared GoldenDemocrat · Maine
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Nick LaLotaRepublican · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia