Bill · H.R. 1555· House(119-HR-1555)
Bureau of Land Management Mineral Spacing Act
- Introduced
- 2/25/2025
- Last activity
- 9/15/2026 — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 16.
- Sponsored by
- Stephanie Bice
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Bureau of Land Management Mineral Spacing Act," aims to amend the Mineral Leasing Act. The goal is to streamline the permitting process for oil and gas exploration and production. It specifically addresses activities conducted on non-Federal surface estate where the United States holds less than a 50 percent ownership interest in the subsurface mineral estate. Under this Act, certain activities would not require a Federal drilling permit if a State permit is submitted. Additionally, it clarifies that these specific actions would not be considered major Federal actions under certain environmental laws.
Yes· 3 of 11
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The bill significantly reduces regulatory costs and timelines for energy producers.
Is this likely to create jobs?+4
Streamlining oil and gas production may facilitate increased energy sector employment.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+3
Rural residents in energy-producing areas may benefit from increased economic activity.
The opposite· 3 of 11
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-5
The bill explicitly exempts activities from the Endangered Species Act and NEPA oversight.
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?-5
The bill is intended to facilitate and expand rather than reduce fossil fuel production.
Would Native Americans be better off under this?-5
The bill specifically excludes Indian lands from its streamlined benefits, maintaining a regulatory disparity.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Streamlined Oil and Gas Activities: Operators can begin production 30 days after submitting a State permit to the Secretary, provided the United States holds less than 50 percent of the subsurface mineral estate (Section 2, paragraph 1 and 2).
-
Reduction in Federal Requirements: Certain oil and gas activities would not be considered a major Federal action under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Section 2, paragraph 2A).
-
Elimination of Specific Federal Regulatory Hurdles: Activities conducted under these provisions would not be subject to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 or section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Section 2, paragraph 2D).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Exclusion of Indian Lands: The provisions regarding the streamlined permitting process and the removal of certain federal requirements do not apply to Indian lands, which include land within reservation boundaries or land held in trust (Section 2, paragraph 4 and 5).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Reduces Gas Prices+2Improves Rural Development+1Improves Environmental Protections-5Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-5Reduces Carbon Emissions-4Improves Public Land Management-3Increases Renewable Energy Investment-2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Union Workers+2Good For Middle Class Households+1Good For Urban Residents+1Good For Native Americans-5
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+4Improves Economic Growth+3Reduces Inflation+1Improves Consumer Protection-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+3Improves Due Process-2Improves Government Transparency-2Increases Federal Power-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity-3
- 9/15/2026
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Discharged
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 16.
- 3/25/2026
- Subcommittee Hearings Held
- 3/18/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
- 11/19/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Introduced in House
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Julie FedorchakRepublican · North Dakota
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas