Bill · H.R. 1539· House(119-HR-1539)
Medical Device Electronic Labeling Act
- Introduced
- 2/24/2025
- Last activity
- 2/24/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Jay Obernolte
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 4
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Medical Device Electronic Labeling Act aims to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. It seeks to expand the types of devices for which required labeling can be provided entirely through electronic means. Under this bill, electronic labeling is permitted if it is easily accessible to intended users. Manufacturers must also allow users to request a paper version of the labeling at no extra cost. Additionally, the Secretary may issue specific orders regarding the labeling of certain device types to ensure safety and effectiveness.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+2
The bill protects consumers by requiring manufacturers to provide paper labeling upon request at no additional cost.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+2
The bill allows for more efficient digital access to medical device labeling instructions.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+1
The bill ensures that those without digital access can still obtain paper documentation at no extra cost.
The opposite
Would children be better off under this?-1
The removal of physical labels could potentially complicate the immediate identification of safety warnings for children's devices.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Electronic Accessibility: Required labeling for devices, including in vitro diagnostic devices, may be made available solely by electronic means, provided it is readily accessible to intended users (Section 2, subparagraph (2)(A)).
-
Consumer Choice for Paper Documentation: Manufacturers are required to provide the opportunity for intended users to request required labeling in paper form, which must be provided promptly and without additional cost (Section 2, subparagraph (2)(B)).
-
Safety Oversight: The Secretary has the authority to issue orders that require device labels to contain specific information or follow certain conditions to ensure a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device (Section 2, subparagraph (3)(C)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential Lack of Physical Labeling: The bill allows required labeling to be made available solely by electronic means, meaning a device or its container may not have all the required information physically attached (Section 2, subparagraph (2)).
-
Requirement for Manual Requests: Because the bill allows for labeling to be solely electronic, users may need to take the extra step of requesting paper information from the manufacturer if they cannot or do not wish to use electronic formats (Section 2, subparagraph (2)(B)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+2
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+1Good For People With Disabilities+1Good For Children-1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- 3/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Scott PetersDemocrat · California