Bill · H.R. 10652· House(119-HR-10652)
San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund Reauthorization Act
- Introduced
- 10/1/2026
- Last activity
- 10/1/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Sponsored by
- Gilbert Cisneros
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund Reauthorization Act. It was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Cisneros and Ms. Chu on October 1, 2026. The legislation aims to reauthorize the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund. Specifically, the bill removes a time limit of 10 years following the initial date of operation for a project. It also increases the authorized funding amount from $146,200,000 to $250,000,000.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+5
The bill reauthorizes and increases funding for the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund to support local environmental restoration projects.
Does this invest in rural communities?+4
Increased funding and removal of time limits for the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund will support local infrastructure and water resource projects.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+4
The legislation provides continued financial support and removes operational time limits for environmental restoration projects in the San Gabriel Basin.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-3
The bill increases the authorized funding amount for the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund from $146,200,000 to $250,000,000.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(1) removes the 10-year time limit following the initial date of operation for projects, which could benefit people by allowing projects to receive continued support past the previous 10-year cutoff.
-
Section 2(2) increases the funding limit for the fund from $146,200,000 to $250,000,000, which could provide more financial resources for the restoration fund and the people it serves.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain specific details regarding negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+5Improves Public Land Management+4Improves Rural Development+4
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+4Good For Urban Residents+4
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-3
- 10/1/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Judy ChuDemocrat · California