Bill · H.R. 10570· House(119-HR-10570)
No Secrets for Data Centers Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 9/24/2026
- Last activity
- 9/24/2026 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Greg Landsman
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the No Secrets for Data Centers Act of 2026. It targets nondisclosure clauses related to the building of data centers agreed to before a lawsuit is filed. Under the bill, certain predispute nondisclosure clauses are made void and unenforceable in judicial and arbitration proceedings. It also stops data center operators from receiving public incentives if those incentives are conditioned on restricting the disclosure of information about building a data center. The rules apply to claims filed on or after the date the act is enacted. State and local laws that are at least as protective of free speech are not prohibited.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+7
The bill prevents data center operators from receiving public incentives if they require secrecy regarding building information, increasing government accountability.
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?+6
By nullifying certain nondisclosure agreements involving public officials and funds, the bill expands individuals' freedom to discuss data center developments.
Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life?+6
The legislation protects free speech by making predispute nondisclosure clauses regarding data center projects unenforceable when tied to public resources.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a) makes covered predispute nondisclosure clauses void and unenforceable in court and arbitration proceedings when dealing with data center buildings involving public officials, public funds, public land, or public incentives. This could be considered positive because it allows people to speak freely and prevents secrecy regarding government dealings and public resources.
-
Section 2(b) blocks data center operators from getting public incentives—such as tax breaks, loans, or grants—if the incentive requires them to hide, restrict, or penalize information about building a data center. This is positive because it holds officials accountable and ensures taxpayer money is not used to fund secret deals.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 2(e)(2) allows for information related to building a data center to be filed confidentially with a public utility commission or similar State agency, provided it is not for receiving a public incentive. This could be viewed negatively by everyday people because it still permits some secrecy behind closed doors when dealing with state utility regulators.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+7Improves Freedom Of Speech+6Increase States Rights+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+4Good For Urban Residents+4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Freedom Of Speech+6
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+4
- 9/24/2026
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland