Bill · H.R. 10568· House(119-HR-10568)
Protecting Biological Data as Critical Infrastructure Act
- Introduced
- 9/24/2026
- Last activity
- 9/24/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
- Sponsored by
- Ro Khanna
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Protecting Biological Data as Critical Infrastructure Act. It amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to protect genetic and other sensitive biometric data. The bill directs the agency to oversee security management, provide training for federal personnel, and take necessary actions to protect biological data and critical biotechnology infrastructure. It also requires the agency to treat genetic data systems involving genomic sequences and other sensitive biometric data as critical infrastructure. Furthermore, the agency must consult and collaborate with United States biotechnology sector stakeholders and other stakeholders to develop security protocols and provide a secure line of communication.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+7
The bill directs the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to protect genetic data systems and sensitive biometric data as critical infrastructure.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+6
The bill strengthens the protection of sensitive biometric and genetic data against security threats and breaches.
Does this give people more control over their personal data?+6
The bill establishes security management, training, and protocols specifically to protect sensitive genetic and biometric data systems.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2 (amending section 2202(c)(14) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002): This provision requires the agency to oversee the planning, management, and coordination of duties related to the security of genetic data systems and sensitive biometric data, while ensuring there is sufficient staff to carry out these duties. This could benefit people by establishing dedicated oversight and staffing to keep sensitive biological information secure.
-
Section 2 (amending section 2202(c)(15) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002): This provision mandates training for relevant Federal personnel regarding the protection of genetic data systems, including addressing unique security challenges and ethical considerations. This is positive because it helps ensure that government workers handling this information are properly trained.
-
Section 2 (amending section 2202(e)(1)(U) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002): This provision requires the agency to provide a secure line of communication for biotechnology stakeholders to raise concerns, report incidents, and request technical assistance. This is a positive step for accountability and safety, giving industry experts a direct and secure way to report problems to the government.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any explicit details regarding potential negative impacts, consequences, or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+6Improves Government Transparency+4Increases Federal Power+4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense+7
- Education And Technology
- Improves Data Privacy+6
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+4
- Healthcare
- Increases Research Funding+3
- 9/24/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Stephanie BiceRepublican · Oklahoma
Scott PetersDemocrat · California