Bill · H.R. 10448· House(119-HR-10448)
Reverse Big Ugly Tax Breaks for Data Centers Act
- Introduced
- 9/16/2026
- Last activity
- 9/16/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Kristen McDonald Rivet
- Cosponsors
- - 29 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Reverse Big Ugly Tax Breaks for Data Centers Act. It changes the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 regarding tax breaks for certain data centers. Specifically, the bill stops qualified data center property from getting bonus depreciation. It also ensures that covered data centers and qualified data center property are not treated as qualified opportunity zone business property. The rules apply to property placed in service or acquired in taxable years beginning after the date the act is enacted.
Yes
Does this raise the taxes companies pay?+4
The bill eliminates bonus depreciation and opportunity zone tax benefits for large data centers, effectively increasing their tax liability.
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?+3
Eliminating specific tax breaks for large data centers will increase federal revenue and reduce the national debt.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
Owners of large data centers will face higher tax burdens due to the removal of bonus depreciation and opportunity zone benefits.
Would high-income households be better off under this?-2
Investors and high-income stakeholders in large data center enterprises may see reduced financial returns from lost tax incentives.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-2
High-net-worth individuals holding significant stakes in major data centers will experience reduced tax advantages.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2 removes bonus depreciation for qualified data center property, which means large data centers will no longer receive this specific tax break.
-
Section 3 stops covered data centers and qualified data center property from being treated as qualified opportunity zone business property, preventing them from receiving those specific zone tax benefits.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not explicitly contain any negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners-3Good For Billionaires-2Good For High Income Households-2Good For High Net Worth Individuals-2Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals-2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Corporate Taxes+4Reduces National Debt+3
- 9/21/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/16/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 26 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Marcy KapturDemocrat · Ohio
Rick LarsenDemocrat · Washington
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
John MannionDemocrat · New York
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Norma TorresDemocrat · California
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida