Bill · H.R. 10321· House(119-HR-10321)
Responsible Data Center Siting Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 9/8/2026
- Last activity
- 9/8/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Suhas Subramanyam
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Responsible Data Center Siting Act of 2026 directs the Secretary of Energy to create best practices for where data centers should be located. The Secretary will consult with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Secretary of Defense, and other appropriate agencies to develop these guidelines. The process requires considering impacts on the electric grid, water use, the environment, local communities, national security, the workforce, and the local economy. Additionally, the Secretary must identify site characteristics that minimize negative impacts and provide a list of ideal locations. These best practices must be published on the Department of Energy website within one year of the Act's enactment. The Secretary is also required to review and revise these practices at least every two years.
Yes· 3 of 16
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+4
Directs the consideration of impacts on air quality, water quality, and surrounding ecosystems.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+3
Protects rural water and air quality from industrial data center impacts.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+3
Establishes best practices for land use regarding the siting of industrial data centers.
The opposite
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-1
Federal guidelines may override or constrain state-level siting preferences.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Electricity Costs and Infrastructure: The bill requires looking at how data centers affect electricity prices for consumers and the need for new transmission infrastructure (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Water and Environmental Security: The Secretary must consider how water use impacts the availability of water for local residents and the surrounding environment (Section 2(b)(2)), as well as impacts on water quality, air quality, and ecosystems (Section 2(b)(3)).
-
Community Character and Comfort: The guidelines will consider impacts on local communities regarding noise, light, and the overall appearance/character of the community (Section 2(b)(4)).
-
National Security: The establishment of best practices includes considering national security implications of where data centers are located (Section 2(b)(5)).
-
Economic and Workforce Benefits: The Secretary will consider the impact of data centers on the local workforce, including job opportunities, and the local economy, including tax revenue (Section 2(b)(6)-(7)).
-
Minimizing Negative Impacts: The Secretary is tasked with identifying site characteristics that would minimize negative impacts and providing a list of ideal locations (Section 2(c)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Electricity Grid Disruptions: The bill notes that data centers may cause changes in electricity prices for consumers and require additional transmission infrastructure buildout (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Environmental Degradation: There is a potential for negative impacts on water quality, air quality, and surrounding ecosystems (Section 2(b)(3)).
-
Local Community Disruptions: Data centers may create negative impacts through noise and light, including from on-site electricity generation, and may change the character of a community (Section 2(b)(4)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Farmers+2Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Business Owners+1Good For Union Workers+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+4Improves Public Land Management+3Improves Rural Development+2Reduces Carbon Emissions+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+2Increases Job Creation+2Improves Consumer Protection+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+3Increases Federal Power+2Increase States Rights-1
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+1
- 9/8/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Hillary ScholtenDemocrat · Michigan