Bill · H.R. 10250· House(119-HR-10250)
No Preference Act
- Introduced
- 9/3/2026
- Last activity
- 9/3/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Stephanie Bice
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "No Preference Act," seeks to amend titles 41 and 10 of the United States Code. The primary goal is to prohibit federal agencies from requiring or giving preference to contractors based on the use of union labor. Specifically, it would prevent executive agency heads from favoring offerors who use workers subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Additionally, it would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from making similar requirements or preferences for defense contracts.
Yes
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The bill allows business owners without union labor requirements to compete more easily for federal contracts.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+3
The bill removes potential barriers for non-union contractors seeking federal contracts.
The opposite
Would union members be better off under this?-7
The bill directly targets the ability of unions to maintain labor preferences in federal and defense contracting.
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?-6
The bill prohibits federal agencies and the Secretary of Defense from giving preference to contractors that use workers subject to collective bargaining agreements.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-3
The reduction in union labor preferences may impact the bargaining power and wages of unionized workers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Removal of union labor preferences for executive agencies: The bill would prevent heads of executive agencies from giving preference to companies based on whether they use workers subject to a collective bargaining agreement (Sec. 2).
-
Removal of union labor preferences for defense contracts: The Secretary of Defense would be prohibited from requiring or favoring an offeror based on whether they use workers subject to a collective bargaining agreement (Sec. 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative impacts or burdens mentioned within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For Union Workers-7Good For Low Income Households-3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+3Improves Union Protections-6
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/4/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/3/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
John RutherfordRepublican · Florida
Steve WomackRepublican · Arkansas