DemocratBill · H.R. 10215· House(119-HR-10215)

Workforce Mobility Act of 2026

Rep. Peters
Age: 68 years
California
Introduced
9/1/2026
Last activity
9/1/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
Scott Peters
Cosponsors
Democrat - 0Republican - 1
Labor and Employment
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The Workforce Mobility Act of 2026 aims to prohibit the use and enforcement of most noncompete agreements. The bill finds that these agreements restrict worker mobility, reduce wages, and slow innovation. While the general rule bans these agreements, exceptions are made for the sale of a business and partnership dissolutions. It also allows for specific noncompete agreements for senior executive officials under certain conditions. Employers may still use trade secret and nondisclosure protections to protect their interests. Enforcement is handled by the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Labor.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Is this likely to grow the economy?+5

    The bill seeks to boost productivity and innovation by removing barriers to worker mobility.

  • Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+4

    Removing noncompetes can facilitate wage growth and easier job transitions for low-income workers.

  • Would middle-income households be better off under this?+4

    The bill aims to increase wages and mobility for the broader workforce.

The opposite

  • Would business owners be better off under this?-3

    The bill restricts how business owners can protect themselves during sales or dissolutions.

  • Would high-income households be better off under this?-2

    Senior executives may face more restrictions on their severance and noncompete negotiations.

  • Does this make it easier to run a small business?-2

    The ban may limit some methods for business owners to protect their interests during sales or partnerships.