Bill · H.R. 10195· House(119-HR-10195)
Mali Security Partnership and Counterterrorism Act
- Introduced
- 8/31/2026
- Last activity
- 8/31/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Jimmy Panetta
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is cited as the Mali Security Partnership and Counterterrorism Act. It requires the Secretary of State to develop a strategy for countering the expansion of al-Qaeda in Mali. The legislation highlights findings regarding the growth of militant groups and their control over territory and trade. It mandates a report to specific congressional committees within 180 days of enactment. This report must cover al-Qaeda's presence, illegal financing networks, and a United States diplomatic strategy.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+9
The core purpose of the bill is to develop a US diplomatic strategy to constrain al-Qaeda's influence.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+8
The bill explicitly calls for improving coordination and information sharing with international organizations and regional partners.
Does this put more money into stopping terrorism?+7
The bill mandates a comprehensive strategy and report to counter al-Qaeda expansion and financing.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 3 requires the Secretary of State to submit a report detailing al-Qaeda's presence, influence, and financing methods in Mali. This is a positive step because it forces our elected officials to examine how terrorist organizations fund themselves through illegal gold trafficking, extortion, and illicit trade.
-
Section 3 mandates an assessment of recruitment pipelines, including the exploitation of local grievances and economic vulnerabilities. This could benefit the public by helping leaders understand how extremists recruit, which is necessary to address the root causes of displacement and violence.
-
Section 3 requires a United States diplomatic strategy that includes engagement with regional partners to improve cross-border coordination. This provision is positive because it aims to constrain al-Qaeda's freedom of movement and address security conditions that facilitate extremist recruitment.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+9Improves International Alliances+8Increases Counter Terrorism Funding+7Improves International Trade+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Increases Federal Power+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+5
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Austin ScottRepublican · Georgia
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina