Bill · H.R. 10119· House(119-HR-10119)
Protecting Local Control of Data Centers Act
- Introduced
- 8/20/2026
- Last activity
- 8/20/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Tom Barrett
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Protecting Local Control of Data Centers Act," aims to protect the authority of state and local governments. It prohibits federal agencies from overriding or bypassing local land-use, zoning, siting, or permitting decisions regarding data centers located on non-Federal land. Additionally, the bill prevents federal agencies from using the receipt of Federal funds as a way to pressure states or local governments into giving up their authority.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+7
The bill significantly strengthens state and local control over land-use and zoning for data centers.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+5
By maintaining local control over land-use and zoning, local communities can better enforce their own environmental and siting standards for data centers.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+5
The bill strengthens local oversight of land-use decisions on non-Federal land.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The bill explicitly restricts federal agencies from overriding or bypassing local authority.
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
Data center operators may face more fragmented or restrictive local regulations due to local control.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Preservation of Local Authority: The bill prevents federal agencies from overriding or displacing State or local land-use, zoning, siting, or permitting authority for data centers on non-Federal land (Section 2). This ensures that local communities maintain control over how land is used in their own jurisdictions.
-
Protection Against Financial Pressure: Federal agencies are prohibited from conditioning the receipt of Federal funds on a State or local government relinquishing or limiting their authority (Section 2). This protects local governments from being forced to give up their regulatory powers in exchange for money.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+5Improves Public Land Management+5
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+7Increases Federal Power-5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Business Owners-3
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/20/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Introduced in House
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin