Bill · H.J.Res. 48· House(119-HJRES-48)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System relating to "Quality Control Standards for Automated Valuation Models".
- Introduced
- 2/12/2025
- Last activity
- 2/12/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- Sponsored by
- Andrew Clyde
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This is a joint resolution introduced in the House of Representatives. It aims to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The rule in question concerns "Quality Control Standards for Automated Valuation Models." If passed, the resolution would ensure that the rule has no force or effect.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?-3
The disapproval of quality control standards for automated valuation models may reduce protections against inaccurate property valuations for consumers.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-2
Removing quality control standards for property valuation models could lead to less reliable home equity assessments for low-income homeowners.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?-2
The lack of standardized quality controls for automated valuations may negatively impact the accuracy of collateral assessments for middle-class homeowners.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the Rule: By providing congressional disapproval, the resolution would prevent the rule relating to "Quality Control Standards for Automated Valuation Models" from having any force or effect. This would stop the implementation of the rule submitted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No information provided: The provided text does not contain details regarding the specific contents of the rule or any potential negative consequences resulting from its disapproval.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households-2Good For Middle Class Households-2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency-1
- 2/12/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- Introduced in House