Bill · H.J.Res. 43· House(119-HJRES-43)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "New Source Performance Standards Review for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels)".
- Introduced
- 2/12/2025
- Last activity
- 2/12/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Andrew Clyde
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency. The rule in question relates to "New Source Performance Standards Review for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels)." If passed, the resolution would ensure the rule has no force or effect.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would business owners be better off under this?+2
Business owners in the petroleum and chemical sectors will face fewer regulatory requirements for storage vessels.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+1
The reduction in industrial regulation may benefit rural communities hosting storage and petroleum facilities.
Is this likely to create jobs?+1
By nullifying EPA regulatory requirements for storage vessels, businesses face fewer compliance-related hurdles to expansion.
The opposite
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-3
The resolution nullifies EPA standards intended to regulate emissions from volatile organic and petroleum liquid storage vessels.
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?-1
By removing regulations on petroleum liquid storage vessels, the bill reduces barriers to fossil fuel infrastructure management.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the EPA Rule: By providing for congressional disapproval, the resolution ensures that the rule regarding "New Source Performance Standards Review for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels" shall have no force or effect. This would prevent the implementation of the rule as submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are listed in the text: The provided text focuses solely on the action of disapproving the Environmental Protection Agency's rule and does not describe any potential negative consequences resulting from that action.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-3Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Rural Residents+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+1Increases Job Creation+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+1
- 2/12/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Introduced in House