Bill · H.Con.Res. 84· House(119-HCONRES-84)
Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove United States Armed Forces from Lebanon.
- Introduced
- 4/13/2026
- Last activity
- 6/4/2026 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Sponsored by
- Rashida Tlaib
- Cosponsors
- - 24 - 1
- Introduced
- Failed
A concurrent resolution is how the House and the Senate settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
This is a short legislative measure called H. Con. Res. 84, introduced in the House of Representatives on April 13, 2026. The bill directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from Lebanon. This action is taken pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution. The forced removal must happen no later than 7 days after the adoption of the concurrent resolution.
Yes
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+5
Bringing active-duty military personnel out of Lebanon positively impacts service members by removing them from a potentially hazardous region.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+5
The resolution directs the removal of United States Armed Forces from Lebanon, potentially reducing risks to service members.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The House: the vote on whether to adopt the resolutionFailed 92–324
A resolution is one chamber speaking for itself — setting its own rules, taking a position, honouring someone — and it never goes to the President. Agreeing to it is the whole decision.
06/04/2026 · Roll call 201 · recorded as “On Agreeing to the Resolution”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 1 directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from Lebanon within 7 days of the resolution's adoption, which could be positive for the people serving in the military because it brings them out of that specific region.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+5
- 6/4/2026
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 92 - 324, 2 Present (Roll no. 201).
- On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 92 - 324, 2 Present (Roll no. 201).
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3872)
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2026
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Con. Res. 84, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the concurrent resolution and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Tlaib demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
- DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H. Con. Res. 84.
- WORDS TAKEN DOWN - During the course of debate, exception was taken to certain words used and a demand was made to have the words taken down. After review, the Chair ruled that the words were in violation of the spirit of debate. Without objection, the words were stricken from the record.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 84.
- Considered pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H3814-3822; text: CR H3814)
- Consideration initiated pursuant to a previous order.
- ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Mast asked unanimous consent that, it be in order at any time to consider H. Con. Res. 84 in the House if called up by the chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs or his designee; that the concurrent resolution be considered as read; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to adoption without intervening motion except for one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by Representative Mast of Florida and Representative Tlaib of Michigan, or their respective designees. Agreed to without objection.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 5/29/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/26/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- 4/13/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Thomas MassieRepublican · Kentucky
Analilia MejiaDemocrat · New Jersey
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey