Amendment · S.Amdt. 925· Senate(119-SAMDT-925)
To create a point of order against legislation that would raise energy costs for Americans, including higher monthly electricity bills, building material expenses, and transportation costs.
- Introduced
- 2/20/2025
- Last activity
- 2/20/2025 — Amendment SA 925 ruled out of order by the chair.
- Sponsored by
- John Hickenlooper
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 0
- Changes bill
- 119-SCONRES-7 — An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
- Introduced
- Ruled out of order by the chair
What this amendment would do
This amendment, numbered SA 925 and proposed by Mr. Hickenlooper alongside Mr. Heinrich and Mr. Gallego, targets the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 through fiscal year 2034.
-
It adds a new point of order to the concurrent resolution.
-
It makes it not in order in the Senate to consider any bill, joint resolution, motion, amendment, amendment between the Houses, or conference report that would raise energy costs for Americans.
-
It allows this rule to be waived or suspended only by a three-fifths affirmative vote of the Senators duly chosen and sworn.
-
It requires a three-fifths affirmative vote of the Senators duly chosen and sworn to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under this section.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this amendment.
None of them settled the amendment — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
- 2/20/2025
- Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Motion to waive all applicable budgetary discipline with respect to amendment SA 925 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 67.
- Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 925 proposed by Senator Hickenlooper.
- Amendment SA 925 proposed by Senator Hickenlooper. (consideration: CR S1103) To create a point of order against legislation that would raise energy costs for Americans, including higher monthly electricity bills, building material expenses, and transportation costs.
- Point of order that the amendment violates section 305(b)(2) of the CBA raised in Senate with respect to amendment SA 925.
- Motion to waive all applicable budgetary discipline with respect to amendment SA 925 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 67.
- Amendment SA 925 ruled out of order by the chair.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Senate amendment submitted
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico