Amendment · S.Amdt. 494· Senate(119-SAMDT-494)
To stop tax cuts for the ultra-rich while families struggle to put food on the table.
- Introduced
- 2/20/2025
- Last activity
- 2/20/2025 — Amendment SA 494 ruled out of order by the chair.
- Sponsored by
- Amy Klobuchar
- Cosponsors
- None
- Changes bill
- 119-SCONRES-7 — An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
- Introduced
- Ruled out of order by the chair
What this amendment would do
As your legislative analyst, let us look at what Ms. Klobuchar is trying to do here for the working people. This amendment is about holding our elected officials accountable when it comes to tax breaks and the money we spend on groceries.
What It Aims to Change
-
The amendment adds a new rule to the Senate budget process.
-
It creates a point of order in the Senate against considering any legislation that cuts taxes for taxpayers with an adjusted gross income greater than $1,000,000,000.
-
This restriction applies if the most recent change in the Consumer Price Index shows an increase in food prices.
-
This rule can only be waived, suspended, or sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this amendment.
None of them settled the amendment — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
- 2/20/2025
- Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Motion to waive all applicable budgetary discipline with respect to amendment SA 494 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 52. Record Vote Number: 63.
- Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 494 proposed by Senator Klobuchar.
- Amendment SA 494 proposed by Senator Klobuchar. (consideration: CR S1100) To stop tax cuts for the ultra-rich while families struggle to put food on the table.
- Point of order that the amendment violates section 305(b)(2) of the CBA raised in Senate with respect to amendment SA 494.
- Motion to waive all applicable budgetary discipline with respect to amendment SA 494 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 52. Record Vote Number: 63.
- Amendment SA 494 ruled out of order by the chair.
- Senate amendment submitted
This bill has no cosponsors