DemocratBill · H.R. 9519· House(119-HR-9519)

Social Security 2100 Act

Rep. Larson
Age: 78 years
Connecticut
Introduced
6/29/2026
Last activity
6/29/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
John Larson
Cosponsors
Democrat - 4Republican - 0
Social Welfare
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The Social Security 2100 Act aims to protect the Social Security system and improve benefits for current and future generations through several benefit increases and cost-of-living adjustments. It seeks to strengthen the Social Security Trust Fund by repealing limitations on the wage base and applying taxes to net investment income. The legislation includes provisions for caregiver credits, extended education benefits, and adjustments to disability benefit waiting periods. It also implements changes regarding accountability, such as prohibiting the wrongful invalidation of account numbers and limiting how overpayments are recovered. Additionally, the bill outlines improvements to service delivery, data protection, and communication standards.

Yes· 3 of 26

  • Would people over 65 be better off under this?+10

    Increases benefits, improves COLA accuracy, and protects access to services and stable payments.

  • Would retired people be better off under this?+10

    Directly increases benefit amounts, improves COLA, and protects sensitive data.

  • Does this strengthen Social Security?+10

    Expands benefits, improves COLA accuracy, enhances data privacy, and secures long-term funding.

The opposite· 3 of 10

  • Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?-10

    Strongly negative impact due to new investment income taxes and removal of wage caps.

  • Would billionaires be better off under this?-10

    Strongly negative impact due to new investment income taxes and removal of wage caps.

  • Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-9

    Significant negative impact due to the 12.4% tax on net investment income.