RepublicanBill · H.R. 7510· House(119-HR-7510)

Preventing Research Ownership Transfer to External Competitive Threats (PROTECT) Act of 2026

Rep. Nehls
Age: 58 years
Texas
Introduced
2/11/2026
Last activity
2/11/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Sponsored by
Troy Nehls
Cosponsors
Republican - 1Democrat - 0
Education
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The ``Preventing Research Ownership Transfer to External Competitive Threats (PROTECT) Act of 2026'' aims to stop certain foreign governments from getting intellectual property from U.S. universities. It prohibits universities, faculty, staff, or students from transferring research rights to "covered foreign governments." These prohibited nations include countries like Russia, China, and Iran, as well as nations in conflict with the U.S. or those supporting terrorist organizations. The Act establishes strict penalties for those who violate these rules. Violations can lead to large civil fines or the seizure of funds. Finally, the Secretary of State holds significant authority in making determinations regarding these threats.

Yes

  • Does this make patent and copyright rules fairer?+5

    The bill ensures that intellectual property developed through university research remains under the control of the institution rather than being transferred to prohibited foreign entities.

  • Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+3

    The bill protects sensitive research related to critical energy or defense issues from foreign acquisition.

  • Would business owners be better off under this?+3

    The bill protects the proprietary value of research developed within domestic institutions.

The opposite

  • Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-5

    The bill limits judicial review of the Secretary of State's determinations, except for specific constitutional claims.

  • Would students be better off under this?-3

    Students affiliated with universities may face institutional financial risks or research limitations due to the strict penalty and seizure provisions.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?-2

    The bill grants the Secretary of State final authority over determinations that are largely shielded from judicial review.