DemocratBill · H.R. 6129· House(119-HR-6129)

Bidirectional Electric Vehicle Charging Act of 2025

Rep. Brownley
Age: 74 years
California
Introduced
11/19/2025
Last activity
11/20/2025 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Sponsored by
Julia Brownley
Cosponsors
None
Energy
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The Bidirectional Electric Vehicle Charging Act of 2025 requires the Secretary of Energy to create a National Electric Vehicle Bidirectional Charging Roadmap. This roadmap must include a strategy, obstacles, key actions for Congress, and cost estimates for various development paces. Additionally, the Secretary of Energy must establish technical standards and require that new electric vehicles, including light-duty motor vehicles and school buses, be capable of bidirectional charging starting in model year 2029. The Act also establishes civil penalties for those who violate these new regulations. Finally, it directs FEMA to require that state or local hazard mitigation plans incorporate bidirectional charging capabilities.

Yes· 3 of 9

  • Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster?+5

    The bill directs FEMA to require that hazard mitigation plans incorporate bidirectional charging capabilities for disaster recovery.

  • Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?+4

    By standardizing bidirectional charging, the bill supports the integration of electric vehicles into the broader energy grid.

  • Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?+3

    The requirement includes school buses, which can provide energy back to the grid during or after transit service.

The opposite

  • Would business owners be better off under this?-3

    Manufacturers face new regulatory requirements and significant civil penalties for noncompliance.

  • Does this make it easier to run a small business?-2

    The establishment of new technical standards and potential civil penalties may pose compliance burdens on smaller manufacturers.