RepublicanBill · H.R. 3825· House(119-HR-3825)

Kelsey Smith Act

Rep. Schmidt
Age: 58 years
Kansas
Introduced
6/6/2025
Last activity
6/6/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
Derek Schmidt
Cosponsors
Republican - 2Democrat - 1
Science, Technology, Communications
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the "Kelsey Smith Act," seeks to amend the Communications Act of 1934. It would require providers of covered services to provide location information of a telecommunications device to law enforcement or public safety answering point employees. This requirement applies during emergency situations involving the risk of death or serious physical harm, or when responding to a call for emergency services. Specifically, providers must provide available location information without delay if a device was used for a 9-1-1 call in the previous 48 hours or if there is reasonable suspicion the device is held by someone in an emergency involving death or serious harm. The bill also establishes record-keeping requirements for law enforcement agencies and provides legal immunity to service providers for sharing this information.

Yes· 3 of 4

  • Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?+4

    The bill expands the ability of law enforcement to access real-time location data during emergencies.

  • Does this give the federal government more power?+3

    The bill establishes federal requirements for service providers to disclose data to law enforcement.

  • Would business owners be better off under this?+3

    Service providers are granted legal immunity from lawsuits related to these disclosures.

The opposite· 3 of 4

  • Does this protect people from being watched or searched?-6

    By requiring the disclosure of location data based on reasonable suspicion, the bill significantly compromises individual privacy rights.

  • Does this give people more control over their personal data?-5

    The bill reduces privacy protections by mandating the disclosure of location data to law enforcement without a warrant.

  • Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-3

    The bill allows for data disclosure without the traditional judicial oversight of a warrant.