RepublicanBill · H.R. 331· House(119-HR-331)

To amend the Aquifer Recharge Flexibility Act to clarify a provision relating to conveyances for aquifer recharge purposes.

Rep. Fulcher
Age: 64 years
Idaho
Introduced
1/13/2025
Last activity
9/30/2026 — Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Sponsored by
Russ Fulcher
Cosponsors
Republican - 1Democrat - 0
Water Resources Development
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. In Senate committee

What this bill would do

This bill amends the Aquifer Recharge Flexibility Act to clarify rules about using existing rights-of-way, easements, and permits for aquifer recharge purposes. Under Section 1(a), a holder may use existing authorizations for aquifer recharge and water transport on behalf of a State, political subdivision of a State, Indian Tribe, or public entity without needing additional authorization from the Secretary. This specific use will not be considered an expansion, modification, or substantial deviation.

Section 1(a) also requires the holder to submit a notice to the Bureau of Land Management at least 30 days before using the existing authorization for aquifer recharge. This notice must identify the entity intending to use it, identify the existing right-of-way or permit, provide details on the intended use and scope, and include a copy of the agreement between the entity and the holder. Additionally, Section 1(b) clarifies that this section does not waive the obligation of the holder to comply with all applicable Federal laws and Bureau policies, nor does it provide authority to construct, modify, or expand any existing infrastructure.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Would Native Americans be better off under this?+5

    The legislation explicitly mentions Indian Tribes as eligible entities on whose behalf existing rights-of-way can be used for water management.

  • Would farmers be better off under this?+5

    Farmers and agricultural public entities benefit from streamlined access to water transport and aquifer recharge using existing infrastructure.

  • Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+5

    Rural communities relying on effective water transport and aquifer storage stand to benefit from clarified regulatory permissions.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.