RepublicanBill · H.R. 2965· House(119-HR-2965)

Small Business Regulatory Reduction Act of 2025

Rep. Van Duyne
Age: 56 years
Texas
Introduced
4/17/2025
Last activity
12/4/2025 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Sponsored by
Beth Van Duyne
Cosponsors
Republican - 5Democrat - 0
Commerce
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. In Senate committee

What this bill would do

This act, known as the "Small Business Regulatory Reduction Act of 2025," directs the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to manage costs. It requires that the small business regulatory budget for the Small Business Administration is not greater than zero for fiscal year 2026 and all years following. The bill defines the regulatory budget as the cost to a small business resulting from new, modified, or repealed federal rules. Additionally, the Chief Counsel for the Office of Advocacy must submit an annual report to Congress regarding rules issued by other Federal agencies. This report must include total regulatory budgets and specific rules issued by each agency. No additional funds are authorized to carry out this Act.

Yes

  • Would business owners be better off under this?+7

    The mandate to keep the regulatory budget at or below zero provides significant relief for business owners.

  • Does this make it easier to run a small business?+6

    The bill mandates a zero or negative regulatory budget to reduce the costs imposed on small businesses by federal rulemaking.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5

    The bill requires annual reports to Congress regarding the regulatory costs imposed by different agencies.

The opposite

  • Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?-3

    Reducing the regulatory budget may limit the ability of agencies to implement new consumer protection rules.

  • Does this give the federal government more power?-2

    The bill limits the power of federal agencies to implement new rules through economic constraints.

  • Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-2

    By capping the regulatory budget, the bill may hinder the creation of new environmental protection regulations.

What Congress actually voted on

One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.

  • The House: the vote on whether to pass the billPassed 223–190

    This is the real decision in this chamber. Passing here sends the bill to the other chamber, which must pass it too before it can go to the President.

    12/03/2025 · Roll call 310 · recorded as “On Passage”