RepublicanBill · H.Con.Res. 121· House(119-HCONRES-121)

Expressing the sense of the Congress that assisted suicide (sometimes referred to using other terms) puts everyone, including those most vulnerable, at risk of deadly harm.

Rep. Murphy
Age: 63 years
North Carolina
Introduced
9/24/2026
Last activity
9/24/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sponsored by
Gregory Murphy
Cosponsors
Republican - 0Democrat - 1
Health
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A concurrent resolution is how the House and the Senate settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.

What this bill would do

This resolution expresses the sense of Congress that assisted suicide puts everyone, especially vulnerable people, at risk of deadly harm. It defines suicide and assisting in a suicide, noting that society has a long-standing policy of supporting suicide prevention programs. The text highlights that assisted suicide directly threatens the elderly, people with depression, individuals with disabilities, and those facing emotional or financial pressure. It details various concerns with state laws, including a lack of required medical attendants, monitors, family notification, and transparent reporting. The resolution points out that insurers have denied life-saving care while offering to cover assisted suicide because lethal medication is cheaper than life-saving treatments. Ultimately, the resolution states that the Federal Government should ensure every person nearing the end of life has access to quality medical care like palliative or hospice care, rather than supporting or facilitating suicide.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Would people over 65 be better off under this?+7

    The resolution expresses the sense of Congress that assisted suicide puts elderly individuals at risk of harm and emphasizes expanding access to quality hospice and palliative care instead.

  • Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+7

    The resolution explicitly states that assisted suicide threatens people with disabilities and asserts that the federal government should not endorse policies facilitating suicide.

  • Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?+6

    The resolution highlights that assisted suicide puts vulnerable populations, specifically individuals with disabilities, at risk of harm and promotes protective end-of-life care alternatives.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.